Widespread of technology has given people more freedom to work instead of travelling to work or college. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage?
The popularity of technology has brought tremendous impacts on humankind in recent years. In my opinion, the advantages of technology would overshadow its disadvantages.
The contribution of cutting-edge technological equipment and application could be witnessed in many aspects of life. First, with the advent of smart devices together with wifi connection, people now are able to study at home or places that are convenient to them. Applications such as Zoom or Google Meet are optimized in order to help many people communicate at once, upload or download learning materials, record lessons easily and effectively. Therefore, studying at people's place of residence become easier than ever. Likewise, the instant connection of wireless devices also enables workers to perform their task at their houses. Job holders, who are used to be burdened with heavy workload and long hours commuting to workplaces, now can speed up their working process and stay at their living places while working simultaneously. This is because with the facilitation of automation, human's mistakes can be limited. From businesses' owners perspective, they do not have to pay for expenditures arise, when staff work in offices. Thus, it is beneficial not only the employees but also employers who can save their budget from renting space and funding neccessities for working.
However, lack of direct communication between managers and subordinates or teachers and students implies several pitfalls. The first problem is that it would lower quality of working or studying. It is unarguable that face-to-face interaction is the best form of communication among people. Therefore, if students or wage-earners heavily depend of online platforms for studying or working, they are likely to experience misinformation or misunderstanding. An additional issue is that people would feel lonely and socially isolated, if they utilized technology for long period. In-person conversation is the most essential way for people in order to building rapport and establishing meaningful relationships. Without directly talking and observing, persons are unable to see others’ body language, watch their behaviors, and listen to their real voices, these factors are fundamental for people to build trust with others.
In sum, although there are certain issues associated with using technology for work and assimilating new knowledge, the role of technology is becoming increasingly significant in modern society. I believe that with new technological breakthoughs, the weeknesses of technological invention will be limited while the positive impact of the sector will be expanded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-14 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important Discuss both views 78
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many parts of the world people now often throw things away when they are broken and buy new ones Whereas in the past things were repaired and used again 84
- Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64824120603 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18935187059 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633165829146 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2180517839 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152733657701 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445120560892 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373269438657 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09438119896 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157556592958 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.