Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that we have no use for the wild life, so we should not waste our valuable resources trying to preserve it. While I disagree with the idea that wild animals have become useless, I do believe that we should manage our resources carefully and apply them on what we can actually save.
In my opinion, wild animals are a huge part of the earth ecosystem and the continuous loss of wild life would compromise the integrity of this system. Although we might not touch their effects on a personal level, the constant extinction of various species could lead to bigger problems that will have a serious impact on the entire world. For example, the loss of spiders, although we might think they are useless and even harmful, can lead to increase in the number of flies to a point that will result in life being impossible to continue on the planet Earth. The ecosystem of earth is always in equilibrium, constantly controlled by many factors, losing one of those factor, like the wild life, could result in catastrophic consequences.
However, we should keep a close attention to the resources invested in the preservation of wild life. Spending millions on saving the habitat of an almost extinct species is the wrong way to go for protecting the wild life. As we can use this money to help improve the conditions for species that have better chances of survival. Also, we should not take money from essential areas of life, like education and infrastructure, to invest them in the preservation of wild life, because the development of a suitable environment for humans is more important, especially with the growing numbers in population worldwide.
In conclusion, I do not believe that we should stop investing in protecting the wild life, because it is a fundamental issue that can affect us all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ppatel | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammad.iraf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | wIsaac | 56 | view |
- Men and women employed in full time jobs should share the responsibilities of household chores Do you agree or disagree Share relevant personal experiences 71
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 60
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students. Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages? 85
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 91
- Some Say music art and drama are as important as other school subjects especially at the primary level Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85256410256 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72833043861 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535256410256 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.017638458 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.636363636 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3636363636 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160253539918 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694324513017 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562978980966 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112128071489 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650702996541 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.