Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
Males and females are often viewed as having differing skill sets. It is agreed that it is correct to exclude people from certain jobs on the basis of their gender, but only in very limited circumstances. This essay will first discuss how physical attributes prevent women from excelling in particular roles; secondly discuss how society at large rejects men from undertaking certain careers, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
For many years the general consensus in the armed forces is that women should not be allowed to participate in combat missions. This is because most women lack the brute strength required for this particular occupation and it is therefore right to prevent them from joining the ranks. For example, the American Army recently allowed some women to fight on the front line and the Department of Defence deemed the experiment a failure, due to lack of fighting effectiveness. Despite this, many women have fought in many wars, famously on the Eastern Front for Russia and the Viet Cong in Vietnam, so maybe it is men’s’ attitudes that prevent them performing rather than their stature.
Society has yet to accept men in many traditionally female positions, such as nanny or beautician. Businesses feel that it is fine to not hire men for these posts because most of their customers would not be willing to have a man perform that service. I personally know of one example when a friend failed at the interview stage when applying to become kindergarten teacher because he was the wrong sex.
To summarise, in limited circumstances it is just to prohibit people from certain occupations, but only if they cannot physically perform or if the general consensus is that it is a single sex post.
- The graph below gives information from a 2006 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 67
- The graph below shows information of employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 84
- Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
- United intergovernmental panel on climate change report that climactic changes in northern hemisphere will cause drastick change in sea current and will raise the sea level. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...soned conclusion. For many years the general consensus in the armed forces is that women shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...hey cannot physically perform or if the general consensus is that it is a single sex post.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in particular', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220125786164 0.247107183377 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.169811320755 0.155533422707 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106918238994 0.0946595960268 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0660377358491 0.0501214627716 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0471698113208 0.0437548338989 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135220125786 0.122226691241 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0440251572327 0.0403226058552 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78384753511 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0345911949686 0.0326793684256 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0817610062893 0.0861772015684 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0125786163522 0.021408717616 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0125786163522 0.011925033212 105% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1732.0 1933.35771543 90% => OK
No of words: 288.0 316.048096192 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01388888889 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361111111111 0.374742101984 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288194444444 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173611111111 0.203846283523 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111111111111 0.137316102897 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78384753511 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.037074148 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.56093040696 107% => OK
Word variations: 65.712298259 60.7387585426 108% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0891783567 68% => OK
Sentence length: 26.1818181818 20.7743622355 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.472065723 49.517814964 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.454545455 127.492653851 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7743622355 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 55.0012626263 49.1944974215 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.41111111111 1.69124875643 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318565027668 0.332605444948 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0927824464525 0.102741220458 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0583546984988 0.0668466124924 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.589638954285 0.534860350844 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17133019077 0.148594505496 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139419526737 0.134430193775 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658211965661 0.0742795772207 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.25269488354 0.324371583561 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0397185853593 0.0638462369009 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210197857849 0.228012699653 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648590321922 0.058150111329 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.68436873747 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.4468937876 77% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.