One long distance of planes consumes more than a car and it can pollute environment more than cars. Therefore the unnecessary flight such as tourist travelling should be discouraged than limit the car use. Do you agree or disagree?
In the past, the trip was limited due to the insufficient transportation mode. As society and technology develop, people can travel around the world easily. Nowadays people can enjoy travel around the world and relax from travelling. By discouraging people to travel, the public's backlash is inevitable and alternative ways of travel would increase. Therefore, the environment damage would be even more severe than that of use of an aircraft.
It is undeniable that the use of aircrafts consumes more fossil gases than that of car and as a result, it can harm the environment more than that of cars. However, the disuse of flights would face the public's backlash because they cannot have more relaxation. In other words, people just get used to the way to travel by planes in this recent century and the restriction of such use would lead the public to backlash. People have enlightened the enjoyment from travel around the world and from this, people can learn various knowledge to understand other people's perspective by knowing such as culture, history and tradition. Therefore, by limiting the travel by airplane could get the backlash for limiting those experiences.
In addition to this, travelling by airplanes have been popular in this recent century for shorter time and fewer efforts. In the case of travelling from Perth to Melbourne would take about 3 hours by flight compared to a few weeks by cars. Due to this shorter travelling time, aircraft travel has gained its popularity. The limitation of travelling by airplane would not stop people travelling. People would use other methods of transportation such as cars, so that it increases the car usages. Since all the aircraft passengers have to use personal vehicles to travel, it can cause the severe environmental damages. Therefore, the use of airplane would be better than all those passengers use cars on the roads to travel.
In conclusion, despite the airplanes can cause environmental damages, it seems more severe than that of cars. However the discouraging the flights would not stop people to travel and which cause even more serious phenomenon to the environment and society. Also the public's backlash will be inevitable.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 67
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most experiences in our lives that seem difficult at the time become valuable lessons for the future. 67
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in two European countries since 2000 and predicted unemployment rates until 2020. 67
- Shopping is dangerous because it makes people selfish and careless with money. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
.... By discouraging people to travel, the publics backlash is inevitable and alternative ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...r, the disuse of flights would face the publics backlash because they cannot have more ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...it seems more severe than that of cars. However the discouraging the flights would not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nomenon to the environment and society. Also the publics backlash will be inevitable...
^^^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...o the environment and society. Also the publics backlash will be inevitable.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'so', 'therefore', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253768844221 0.247107183377 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.143216080402 0.155533422707 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0829145728643 0.0946595960268 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0427135678392 0.0501214627716 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0175879396985 0.0437548338989 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138190954774 0.122226691241 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0427135678392 0.0403226058552 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78707333556 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0376884422111 0.0326793684256 115% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110552763819 0.0861772015684 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0452261306533 0.021408717616 211% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00251256281407 0.011925033212 21% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2198.0 1933.35771543 114% => OK
No of words: 360.0 316.048096192 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10555555556 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369444444444 0.374742101984 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.272222222222 0.28420135186 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197222222222 0.203846283523 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130555555556 0.137316102897 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78707333556 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.037074148 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455555555556 0.56093040696 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.9474101268 60.7387585426 77% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.7743622355 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7163827956 49.517814964 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9 127.492653851 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7743622355 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.45 0.814263465372 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 45.2222222222 49.1944974215 92% => OK
Elegance: 2.13580246914 1.69124875643 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345339642945 0.332605444948 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.15495446613 0.102741220458 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103048453171 0.0668466124924 154% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.514692219533 0.534860350844 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0957911419053 0.148594505496 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147288776521 0.134430193775 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09253633333 0.0742795772207 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.529808295809 0.324371583561 163% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0929176926264 0.0638462369009 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275788310723 0.228012699653 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362958324581 0.058150111329 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 2.5751503006 311% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.4468937876 163% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.