The table shows source of student income over a five-year period in the United States.
The table represents the information about the four main sources of income to support student’s expenses from 2010 to 2015 in the United States.
Overall, the main form of income source has been changed over five decades; the grant was the main source of income in 2010 and earnings but bank loan was becoming the main form of income sources by 2015.
Looking in details, grants were the main source of income for US students in 2010 (of 52 students supported by it) and which number decreased systematically to 16 students by 2015. The next highest income source was parental contribution in 2010 where 32 students supported by this method. However, this number declined steadily and 25 students were supported by their parents in 2015. The lowest income sources in 2010 were bank loan and earnings where only 6 and 10 students supported by this method respectively and this number rose substantially to over 29 students for bank loan supports and 30 students supported by own earnings by 2015.
In conclusion, the total amount of income received or earned by students increased relatively over five year periods from $9153 to $11563.
- The graph below shows a percentage who drank each unit group on heaviest drinking day by age group, 2014 in the UK. 61
- It is generally discussed among the public that extreme sports such as sky diving and rock-climbing should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 56
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 67
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...2015. The lowest income sources in 2010 were bank loan and earnings where only 6 and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'banked'.
Suggestion: banked
... The lowest income sources in 2010 were bank loan and earnings where only 6 and 10 s...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'look', 'so', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.285024154589 0.268076937826 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.115942028986 0.116061578633 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0579710144928 0.0759168565197 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0338164251208 0.0366838410393 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00966183574879 0.0131127313244 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154589371981 0.155750635184 99% => OK
Participles: 0.048309178744 0.0379272487307 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65560143156 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.024154589372 0.0210936926555 115% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0772946859903 0.0948980150116 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0144927536232 0.00967000014798 150% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1139.0 1161.00487805 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.9 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96335078534 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371727748691 0.337110787985 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261780104712 0.247514529752 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.204188481675 0.171178102325 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0837696335079 0.112407865282 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65560143156 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48167539267 0.546246751206 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.3336305912 49.3433353143 82% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 27.2857142857 23.0094962315 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4252626437 42.9750493124 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.714285714 135.714022679 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 23.0094962315 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.689975730869 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 53.4637247569 47.7609492067 112% => OK
Elegance: 3.06060606061 2.94281807926 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384684336759 0.418131533498 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.245187202785 0.181151798455 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0787704592074 0.0850326197045 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.826013097655 0.706616315825 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170731000816 0.157042692854 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220803487823 0.228904883108 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134884571082 0.108899403657 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.315428529801 0.367819155151 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0664877451252 0.0812612215331 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306564940757 0.316326947829 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104682018405 0.0921553760075 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.08536585366 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.