The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people appreciate that there should be only one government in the world rather than a national authority in each nation. This proposal, albeit having certain benefits, would cause more overwhelming problems.
A global government would make fair resources distribution become feasible. This is derived from the fact that geologically, the natural resources are unevenly distributed on Earth. In other words, resources are concentrated in specific places because of the processes by which they form. For example, oil is often found under the seafloor, thus belong to countries bordering the ocean only. A one-world authority would allocate resources equally to all nations worldwide. By contrast, the imaginary unitary government would have thousands of regions with distinctive cultures; therefore the citizens might have different and even diametrically opposing ideologies. As a result, allowing other nations to take advantage of their precious resources seems to be unacceptable for some individuals.
Cutting down on the budget of the governmental workforce is another merit that a single universal authority may bring. By establishing a mutual government, the number of employees would be minimalized. The smaller the workforce is, the less budget is spent on paying workers’ salaries.
The drawback, however, would be more likely to happen. If the only centralized government does not function well, not a single country but all the world will have to suffer from a crisis, leading to adverse consequences on the community such as uncontrollable inflation.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanation, the advantages of having a one-world government would be outweighed by the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-01 | oanhnth | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | oanhnth | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | oanhnth | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not well managed What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that the benefit 89
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 84
- The influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity What are the primary causes of the loss of biodiversity What solutions can you suggest 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... A global government would make fair resources distribution become feasible. This is d...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71984435798 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19281032319 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1591692939 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348007660719 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100966585684 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133134231191 0.0667982634062 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209764417492 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136466433817 0.056905535591 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.