Write about the following topic.
Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In our contemporary world, the job sector is booming and also runs the livelihood of a significant proportion of the population. The job must completely be offered on the basis of talent, knowledge, and skill. Employers who discriminate between the natives and the people who migrated from poorer nations are totally unfair. In my opinion, I completely agree with the statement that talented people from poor nations should be equally provided with all the opportunities.
It is true that the facilities of most of the companies are situated mostly in more developed nations. Sometimes the government of these particular nations imposes some rules and regulations, in the form of quota, which consumes a myriad of job vacancies. This eventually reduces the number of opportunities for the people who migrated there in search of jobs. For instance, if a person is graduated in a particular field with all the skills required from his respective country and aspires to grab a job in the international market, he is usually not valued. Despite, being more talented and knowledgeable in contrast to their native aspirants, not even able to reach up to the selection rounds, is totally unfair. However, it can be witnessed that if someone with the same condition is given the opportunity, the performance comes out to be remarkable, as what the value of this job has for him can never be for a native aspirant.
Moreover, if talented and skilled persons from poorer nations get recognised and valued by the more financially stable countries, it can be beneficial in improving the financial conditions of the particular country as well. The more they grasp the opportunities the more money they can earn for themselves which in turn nurtures their weak economy. What is more, not providing the opportunity of a job to a talented and skilled candidate can be a huge wastage of skilled manpower, which an organization usually avoids. Having a more knowledgeable person onboard does add uncountable advantages to the particular department.
To reiterate, I completely with the statement that more financially stable countries should open up their opportunities for all the talented and knowledgeable people irrespective of the financial conditions of their respective nations. Every talented aspirant must be equally treated and provided with all the opportunities as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-04 | quytnee | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | Sayansh Garg | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Mohsensnake | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Mohsensnake | 56 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of job should be highly paid Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ow 67
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a 73
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, well, as for, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, it is true, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24736842105 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09681723844 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489473684211 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5957915682 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165417241746 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581612467577 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392574241852 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110628719361 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220803511123 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.