Write about the following topic:
Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Learning face-to-face in class has sparked heated controversy worldwide. There is no doubt that collaborative studies in the classroom bring more plus sides to the student. I would argue that both situations will have pros and cons, which I will analyze in the essay below.
Initially, It is crucial that learning with pupils group can be advantageous in a variety of respect. The primary reason for this stems from the easy adjustment in learning speech according to scholar's level. Since each general public is not similar to each other and each individual has a divergent focus ability. Thus, giving a knowledge environment is at school will help pedagogues have easy order to complement them. In addition, adolescents' social skills can also have a rocket when they study face-to-face at school. One reason for this is that verbal communication between them can teach young adults how to socialize in a wide range of diverse situations. Hence, those who are lack experience in this regard will be at a drawback in later life.
Despite the gains presented above, I also maintain that kind of traditional learning can be a hindrance in numerous cases. Firstly, studying like this can not save maximum expense. A good illustration of this is schoolboys and schoolgirls wasting lots of currency to go from home to school. This one inevitably had a detrimental effect on their family finances. Another significant obstacle is time. Instead of consuming time to move distance between school and house, the lecturer can expend their time to do dominant work such as prepare their new lesson or complete their unfinished homework. This prodigal time can lead to stress and plummets the time available for more practicing and studying.
To summarise, although it is undeniable that there are some positive aspects to scholars should jointly learn in the classroom but it is of paramount importance that school attendees are made aware of the potential risks involved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Write about the following topic Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- Temperature and Daylight Hours 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...according to scholars level. Since each general public is not similar to each other and each i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 678, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nge of diverse situations. Hence, those who are lack experience in this regard will be ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, thus, in addition, kind of, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1214953271 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79831250698 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9320814187 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129697162718 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397262603191 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344363757769 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710597890208 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302625474352 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.