WRITING TASK 2 :
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task
Write about the following topic:
Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In the interest of the public heath, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or
experience.
Write at least 250 words.
These days, there have been widely differing views on the issue of whether smoking should be prohibited in society. Some people believe that it is their right to smoke and that forbidding cigarettes would be a breach of civil liberties. Nevertheless, I would contend that tobacco should be banned for the sake of a better community. The justifications for this are twofold.
First and foremost, it is an irrefutable fact that smoking is detrimental to humans’ physical and mental health. To embark on, cigarettes are assumed to contain highly addictive ingredients like nicotine, which are responsible for such fatal ailments as lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and so on. In other words, while smoking brings about relaxation and entertainment in the short term, its long-term effect will be significantly negative. On top of that, if heavy smokers are short of money, they are more likely to go to great lengths, including committing criminal activities, to satisfy their addiction, which causes unrest in society.
Further and even more importantly, though, prohibiting tobacco products would be beneficial to public health. Some may stick to conservative views that the choice to smoke or not is a form of human right. However, this is selfish as non-smokers would suffer from smoking fumes in the atmosphere, also known as passive smoking. Besides, despite the considerable revenue a country gains from taxes on tobacco products, the medical treatment costs a smoker requires are even greater and no one but the government is responsible for covering these costs. Therefore, it is advisable that smoking be forbidden in order for the government to save money for allocating in other fields.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my position that the disadvantages of smoking outweigh the benefits and that the prohibition of smoking is considered crucial in the foreseeable future.
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00209371384 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5277040584 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.785714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123683049308 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424743980913 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220968869321 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712770714663 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237182549935 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.