You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the
governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or
disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your
own knowledge and experience.
As the world approaches the Information Age, the scientific level is better than any other time. Some individuals insist that scientific activities should be regulated by authority instead of private companies. I support this view completely, for the government can provide amount of fund firstly, and it can regulate conducting research in the ethical framework secondly.
Transparently, government, controlling scientific research, benefit the development of science because it can provide sufficient financial budget. As an evidence of this, the Apollo program is a milestone of human beings' history, for mankind can perform space traveling to moon. However, during the period of twelve years, this program spend nearly 107 billion the US dollar, so companies can not bear the huge expense undoubtedly. Based on this fact, if government were not leadership of this program, people would never embark on moon. Therefore, government play an important part in human beings' scientific research.
Furthermore, the authority taking part in academic research is able to guarantee scientific activities in the ethical framework because the authority can institute some law to prevent unethical research. For example, genetic technology is not mature, and thus no one can control its experimental result, especially researching on human beings. To prevent uncertain disaster, the government can cease unethical research, if it has taken part the research.
However, private companies endure the competitive race admittedly, so they prefer continuing to explore new technology or novel products. But, in fact, many companies are not patient to promote the scientific revolution or provide fragment research outcomes. Today's scientific level is better than any other time, because authority can provide excellent conditions for scientific workers.
To recapitulate, I supports government to take part in scientific activities. Government provide amount of financial supports and censor the moral standard of science, so it benefit mankind's development of science. In general, private companies can provide limit scientific contribution.
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 70
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 67
- dddssss 11
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to downloadcopyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- 20 minutes 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
... Apollo program is a milestone of human beings history, for mankind can perform space ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r than any other time, because authority can provide excellent conditions for sci...
^^
Line 10, column 20, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'support'
Suggestion: support
...ientific workers. To recapitulate, I supports government to take part in scientific a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 175, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'benefits'?
Suggestion: benefits
...or the moral standard of science, so it benefit mankinds development of science. In gen...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... provide limit scientific contribution.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88782051282 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04129851059 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3045627596 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.058823529 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161299796147 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604202802144 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350228276961 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982026902213 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407696230354 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.