Zoos are well known to display heterogeneous collection of animals to people and education them on wild animals. It is one major source to view animals that we don’t get to see everywhere in our daily life. But to what extend Zoos are necessary is disputable. The following essay analyses the various pros and cons of zoos.
Firstly, Wild animals are trapped from their natural habitat and are kept in cages and tiny artificial habitat that is created in the zoo. We see many cases where these wild animals are not taken proper care. They have little space to move around and don’t open live in groups. They are also trapped for years in the zoo. This does not help to preserve the wild animals but instead exaggerate the wild life.
On the other hand, many animals that were present hundreds of years ago are not seen any more. Our younger generations might not get to even see the various wild animals that currently exist. One such example is mammoth. These animals lived in the cold climatic conditions and disappeared gradually with the changing weather conditions. Many animals in wild die due to starvation. This can be avoided in zoo. Additionally, some wild animals like deer have so protection from other wild animals. Animals like lions, tigers kill other animals that like in the forest for their survival. This also can be avoided in zoo.
In conclusion, zoos are helpful to preserve animals and protect them from various conditions they face in wild but also its necessary to provide proper habitat for them to live.
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 16
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to natural environment. Discuss some arguments for and /or against keeping animals in zoo. 56
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 16
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to natural environment Discuss some arguments for and or against keeping animals in zoo 76
- In order to produce successful original work, scholars and scientists must first study the successful work of others to learn what contributions remain to be made. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85660377358 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40894263692 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51320754717 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2009557392 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.7368421053 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9473684211 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221593324068 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763172835213 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569374068017 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149025158537 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00940843285228 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.