11/10/2017
Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
Moves produced abroad are often more popular than locally made ones. Below some possible reasons for the trend will be discussed, and whether a government ought to buttress local film industries or not will be considered in details.
To begin with, foreign films are popular due to several reasons. Firstly, Hollywood and European movies usually have better quality of picture, more interesting plot, spectacular special effects and star famous actors and actresses. Those features incentivize public to spend their money and time on watching the overseas product. Secondly, a novel and peculiar culture oftentimes is being presented in films shot abroad. In fact, each movie represents new prospect on the reality and the values of the country in which it was produced. Viewers who seek emotions and novel, mind-breaking outlook on life are drawn to the unusual movies created in distant countries. Those are two secrets of the success of foreign films.
Furthermore, the overwhelming popularity of overseas cinema, in particular, American one makes sponsoring local movie industries by government structures a worthwhile endeavor. Primarily, this step may stimulate the production of films that will promote national interests, values, traditions and a feeling of patriotism. This investment will likely have an advantageous impact on local culture that is threatened by the spreading Hollywood influence. In addition, allocating money to national companies has a benevolent effect on the quality of movies produced and motivates country’s businesses to pay more attention to the lucrative theme. Thus, the industry will be well-financed, strengthened, revitalized and local movies will become more competitive in domestic and international territories due to their overall higher quality. In other words, government support is fruitful in many ways.
In conclusion, foreign films are extremely popular due to their quality and novelty, supporting the country’s film industry may make the movies produced locally more competitive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | aghalandar | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Bilal-88 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Bilal-88 | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-15 | Ragesh R | 89 | view |
| 2017-10-11 | EugeneDubinchuk | 51 | view |
- The vice president for human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president."In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees' Internet use from thei 60
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most c 70
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton Acco 76
- 04/11/2017 You are going to another country to study. You would like to do a part-time job while you are studying, so you want to ask a freind who lives there for some help.Write a letter to this freind. In your lettergive details of your study planexplai 70
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 60
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
better to use 'however' or 'on the other hand' instead of 'Furthermore' in the third paragraph since the idea is different to the second paragraph.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 305 350
No. of Characters: 1688 1500
No. of Different Words: 182 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.179 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.534 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.865 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 118 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.062 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.26 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.479 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.009 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74098360656 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0252542698 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613114754098 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2687787291 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0625 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293418475223 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904926879024 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687995288889 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204919766737 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644414015357 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.