2. Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to?
Many may argue that successful persons come from successful regions and that a favorable environment can make anyone a successful person. But every successful person once originated from the native regions. It is a person’s determination, capability and attitude that he possesses which makes him a successful person.
Native regions can play detrimental role in the life of a person because of the education and the environment and people they are surrounded with which my impact leadership and social skills. Such qualities are possessed by one in a certain period of time from his experience. For example, MK Gandhi, learned the leadership skills he possessed from his childhood.
It is not the native region that holds back a person from success but the persons determination and willingness to learn and prosper. Moving to other places introduces an individual to new ideas and new ways of doing things. It allows a person to thing in a broad perspective and this open minded thinking plays a vital role in a person’s success. For example, DhirubhaiAmbani a renowned entrepreneur achieved all his success because of him moving out of his native region and having the willingness to learn to determination to prosper. While moving to different places he learnt different people and various skills which he was not aware of at his native place. And these new learning helped him rule the business world.
It can very easily be said that being born with a silver spoon in one’s mouth doesn’t really state that he is destined to be a successful person. The region of the world that one belongs to is not the only factor that acts behind ones success but ones conviction, demeanor, competence among other factors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-06 | Ammu helen | 86 | view |
| 2018-03-05 | halbouni1984 | 73 | view |
| 2017-05-09 | saad_mahmoodkhan | 56 | view |
- Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in NewZealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant. 61
- Nowadays courses and general study online are getting very popular. However, some people still prefer attending classes in person. Discuss both views and give your own option. 11
- In some countries, the quality of life in larger cities is declining. Why do you think this is happening ? What measures can be taken to stop it ? 55
- Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this point? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experie 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
Many may argue that successful persons come from...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ities are possessed by one in a certain period of time from his experience. For example, MK Ga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...olds back a person from success but the persons determination and willingness to learn ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...actor that acts behind ones success but ones conviction, demeanor, competence among ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08041958042 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93889594816 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524475524476 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4503348792 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263168504576 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964607811971 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860983996963 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162498594256 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538263795464 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.