All over the world, the rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer.
What problems does this cause?
How can we overcome the problems of poverty?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge
or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
The economic imbalance is evident throughout the world. It is a crisis which can impact in coming future, leaving no room for small businesses and the entire capital is gained by few giants across the world. Consequently, the rich becoming prosperous and the poor scaling down to poverty. The possible reasons and solutions to this situation are discussed in the following paragraphs.
Capitalism is the topic trending these days. The financial power in the hands of few creates a problematic situation in handling the economics of the country. As these big giants suppress the small business, leaving a void in the development of local industries, and restricting the growth of new industrial market leaders. Most often, to avoid bankruptcy, many individuals end up taken jobs so that they car earn their daily bread. Moreover, this leads to a monopoly as the number of competitors are eliminated, provoking the market capitalisation.
However, poverty cannot be eliminated in a day, it usually takes a long term planning as per the upcoming situations. Firstly, professional education must be promoted in every state by the government, so that instead of government giving contractual work to big firms, they can hire skilled workers for the development of projects. Secondly, the pay scale must be standardised across all the firms (private and public sectors) to avoid discrepancy in the pay-checks. Lastly, the government should provide loan to small businesses at a lower rate of interest, so that more jobs can be made available for the youths.
In India, the government is addressing this situation by implementing various benefits to reduce the financial gap between the wealthy and impoverished population. Government has introduced the MSME plan, where many small scale industries have got benefits of it. Additionally, Prime Minister promoting "Vocal for Local", gained confidence in the local businesses. Besides, tax relaxation till specific income limit has been fruitful to the majority of the low-income families.
In conclusion, the administration should focus on both the wealthy businesses by allocating required infrastructure and other facilities as they contribute in significant scale in terms of employment as well as taxes, on the other hand, extra benefits to the poor people in terms adroit dexterity and financial support will help the majority of the population.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-19 | jksidhu | 89 | view |
2020-10-27 | parabshreyas | 84 | view |
2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 71 | view |
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures To what extent do you agree 78
- You have a friend who lives in a city abroad You have decided that you would like to apply to do a course at one of the colleges in this city Write to your friend explaining what you would like to do Tell him her what type of work or studies you have been 46
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others think that there are more advantages to living in an apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages to living in a house rather than in an apartment 61
- Nowadays more and more people have to compete with young people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What are some possible solutions 61
- Letter You live in a room in college which you share with another student However there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college In the letter Describe the si 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43466666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10155917779 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589333333333 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5986932813 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904739794988 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276010170492 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319254102614 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491544235563 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499156989216 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43466666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10155917779 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589333333333 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5986932813 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904739794988 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276010170492 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319254102614 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491544235563 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499156989216 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.