Throughout history, there has been considerable discussion about the exploitation of those working at the bottom of a company. Some people suggest that all workers, regardless of their positions, should be treated equally and given the same number of holidays, while others do not agree. From my perspective, people in a company should be treated differently.
Admittedly/Undeniably, the employee-friendly policy helps reduce financial loss, and the General Motors is a good example. The CEO of General Motors cannot endure to lose more than 20 billion dollars a year, so he and the company’s executives come up with a resolution strategy, which allows all employees to have the same number of holidays. Afterward, the company shows a turn from loss to profits because the employees are getting more motivation and working harder than before. However, this does not necessarily imply that all workers could have the same number of vacations in a year.
In fact, the equal treatment of all employees might lead to the paralysis of companies. As we know, a company consists of many requisite sectors, such as sales department, marketing department, and purchasing department. The company cannot operate without any of these departments. If all people have the same days of annual leave, managers would have difficulty seeking substitutes who are competent for the jobs assigned. Therefore, it is very likely that there will be not enough people going to keep the company running.
Second, the different treatment for annual leave reflects the value of promotion and the commitment workers make. People will get incentives, if they become a leader of one division with more benefits above those of others. According to the data of University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, treating employees differently makes a significant difference to the increasing rate of capitalization. For example, the increasing rate of the company treating staff differently is twenty percent faster than that of the company treating staff with the same number of vacations. This is mainly due to the fact that it can stimulate people to compete, and this competition helps maximize the profits of the company.
In conclusion, the idea of offering employees equal days of vacations is completely unacceptable. This practice leads to the breakdown of a company and encourages workers to show their potentials to their fullest. Hence, all companies should not follow this trend.
- Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sport for younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 87
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34536082474 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08015031524 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548969072165 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0725591896 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.7 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331000674682 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933049832716 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849036419682 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180009994356 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638232673508 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.