Almost everyone agrees that we should be training children to recycle waste to save the Earth’s natural resources. Some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste. Others argue that school is the best place to teach do this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
There is no doubt that the Earth’s natural resources are under a very high risk of depletion due to many factors such as the method of recycling waste, therefore, children should be taught the best way to do so. However, the question of whether the school or home is the best place to learning and practicing to do this is arguably the most debatable issue. This essay aims to discuss this contentious matter in further detail and before coming to a conclusion.
To commence with, it’s irrefutable that children spend most of their time at schools, thus, the opportunity to learn about some efficient recycling methods is conspicuously higher there. Firstly, teachers can easily demonstrate the significance of recycling waste in very attractive ways. For example, many videos, which specialized for a certain group of age, might provide some vital information about the benefit of recycling that ultimately motivate children to practicing it.
On the flip side, parents undoubtedly have a high leverage on raising their children and teaching them many skills. First of all, children need a direct and micro supervision from their parents in order to learn how to recycle their waste. To put simply, children usually imitate their parents in different things, so, teaching them some necessary skills such as putting certain waste in allocated bins and keep watching and repeating the instruction to them day by day will eventually lead this good skill to be as a regular matter of their life.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that schools and parents at homes are both equally playing a crucial role in acquiring such a pivotal knack for children.
- People in your area are having problems with their internet connection. Write a letter to the company that provides the connection. In your letter,•Describe the problem.•Explain how that is affecting people.•Say what the company should do to help. 89
- These days, in many countries, fewer and fewer people want to become teachers, particularly in secondary schools. What are the reasons for this, and how could the problem be solved? 78
- Almost everyone agrees that we should be training children to recycle waste to save the Earth s natural resources Some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste Others argue that school is the best place to teach do this 71
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print innewspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we becomeused to bad news, and would it be better if more good news was reported? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... taught the best way to do so. However, the question of whether the school or home is the best place to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practicing doing'.
Suggestion: practicing doing
... home is the best place to learning and practicing to do this is arguably the most debatable iss...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, no doubt, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75586927139 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.650556469 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.7 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349999574096 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121124193182 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643085389155 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178171284732 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049839406206 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.