Are romantic movies damaging to real relationship?
There is a controversial issue about the role of romantic movies in society. Some social workers state that this type of movie destroys love affairs, while some film producers believe that this genre reinforces them. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of positive effect.
Let us start with the reasons why some social workers argue that romantic movies cause a detrimental influence on love in real life. The first reason is that couples tend to compare their relationship with the ideal characters on TV. Many people unreasonably demand their halves to correspond the image of their favorite characters in TV series, but they often fail to meet their requirements, because each person differs from one another. Another reason is that many people seek tend to become idealistic about love. Many single people refuse to date those applicants, who fail to meet their expectations formed from their favorite movies about amour. Therefore, they suffer from their irrational demands, and it usually takes a long time, before they realize that real dating is contrary to that from romantic films.
However, some movie-makers say that movies about love improve romantic relationship. They justify their point of view with the following arguments. Firstly, this genre teaches people how to love each other. Many couples are prone to forget how healthy relationship looks, but with the help of this type of movie, they can recall it and breath a second life into their dying relationship. Secondly, romantic movies help inexperienced people build a lasting relationship with the opposite sex. They show, for example, young people how to avoid abusive relationship, so that they can successfully find the one, who values them for their personality rather than for their sexual attractiveness.
In conclusion, even though social workers claim that romantic movies harm love affairs in real, I think that they bring positive effects on love for the mentioned above reasons.
- More developing countries are given aid from international organizations to help them in their development plans Some people argue that financial aid is important but others suggest that practical aid and advice are more important Discuss both views and g 81
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public.To what extent do you agree? 84
- In many countries, very few people read newspapers or follow the news on TV.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer people are walking there days.What are the reasons for this?What can be done to tackle this problem? 84
- Although you have never formally studied computing, you have always been interested in computers. You have just read about a computer course that really interests you, but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course.Write a letter to the 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22910216718 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62171160456 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56346749226 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6195863065 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249251083092 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991586443329 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101733331702 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160598514421 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380087648895 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.