Nowadays, we can easily see the fact that art does not play an important part of human' s life as it used to, instead of joining in this career, people tend to pay much more attention on science, technology and business areas. From my point of view, there are many reasons can explain for this trend, however, art is still an unchangeable things in people' life so we should have some measures to improve its attraction again.
Generally, we can not deny the reality that science, technology and business has been contributing a lot of benefits to human's living, therefore it is easily for us to understand why people nowadays like to focus on these areas. Technologies are the essential tools which can be applied to almost careers. Unlike art, instead of focusing on producing by hand, technical devices not only encourage people make things easier, faster but also develop the quality of products. In addition, The careers which relate to science or business tend to provide people with stable jobs with stable salary rather than those relate to art.
On the other hand, saving the value of art is not less important because it plays an essential role of culture of each nation. The first common way to attract people take part in the art area was create some new job which can encourage people to cooperate art and technology. For example, graphic design, animation or photography are the careers which demand the artists' knowledge about technology. Last but not least, young artists today need to try their best to produce some creations which have the ability inspire other people.
In conclusion, although science and business are more and more important nowadays, the value of art need to be preserved by community.
- Many people believe that counties should produce food for all population eats and import food as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 67
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 73
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
..., however, art is still an unchangeable things in people life so we should have some m...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...ct people take part in the art area was create some new job which can encourage people...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
...graphy are the careers which demand the artists knowledge about technology. Last but no...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90784982935 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49901610244 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590443686007 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.05800084 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.727272727 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235236712939 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895275713968 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457562404355 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141878748394 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170469261713 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.