The best curriculum is not one based on a static body of knowledge but one which teaches students to cope with change. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Without any doubt, society is divided into two groups as per their distinct mindset of desperate people. Therefore, this has become a debatable issue. Whether the school subjects need to change according with a new changes or teachers should take initiative this. This essay will not only shed light on both perceptions but also my point of view will be elaborated in conclusion.
To commence with first notion there are myriad things to in its favour. First of all, school curriculum should teach us the skills required to earn livelihood. The main objective is acquiring skills that helps with the challenges in life. Secondly, it should equip the knowledge in all sphere of subjects and life. For example, learning history is essential to avoid any mistakes that may happen and also geography gives knowledge about atmosphere which is indispensable for future generation. Consequently, this basic cannot be change or remove from school subjects.
Moving towards the second side of this notion, the first point is, as history and science there is no point in learning about how Edison’s theory, which is not relevant in these days. For instance, technology has been made vast changes in everywhere so there is no significant in teaching children about old stories about how invented lamps and old computers that occupied. These technologies are no longer used, but still in books. Similarly, in old computer programs no need to learn languages, while should focus on new advancements which is relevant right now. It does not mean that the old teachings should not need to talks at all.
To conclude, I reiterate that curriculum is designed in accordance with the need of times. It should be including old knowledge if it is still relevant. If it is not, remove that and new information should be added
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-09 | phuocthanhho | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | SOJI | 41 | view |
- Learning in one s nature tongue yields better school scores that learning in a medium language Do you agree or not 78
- In many cities planners have separated schools homes shops and offices into specific areas which are widely separated from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages for city residents 89
- Crime rates are likely to decline due to the advancement in technology which will help prevent and solve crimes more easily do you agree or disagree 89
- You Have Recently Started Work In A New Company 73
- Children watch Tv more these days compared to the past.is it positive or negative development. 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...cts need to change according with a new changes or teachers should take initiative this...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'talk'.
Suggestion: talk
...at the old teachings should not need to talks at all. To conclude, I reiterate that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03666666667 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68512569538 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5421251969 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9444444444 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106076858651 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343453627853 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271607827314 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666735139148 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238075944494 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...cts need to change according with a new changes or teachers should take initiative this...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'talk'.
Suggestion: talk
...at the old teachings should not need to talks at all. To conclude, I reiterate that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03666666667 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68512569538 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5421251969 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9444444444 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106076858651 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343453627853 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271607827314 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666735139148 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238075944494 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.