The best curriculum is not one based on a static body of knowledge, but one which teaches students to cope with change. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many people argue that the best way to educate students is to faciliate them lessons that the current society is demanding instead of only conventional knowledge. From my opinion, while I concur with the idea, I also beleive that the benefits of traditional currliculum cannot be overlooked.
It is undeniable that offering students with up-to-date lessons may facilitate them a future's preparation. To begin with, an updated curriculum enables students to catch up with the newest knowledge trend worldwide. Hence, if students are fully-equipped with trendy knowledge during school, they may not lag behind at work afterward. In addition, in the current overwhelmly competivtive labor market, having a profound insight into trendy knowledge empowers students with strength over other candidates. For instance, with the advancement of technology and high demand of modern life, companies and organizations regularly would give priority to employees who are equipped with computer-based skills and work with digitization-related tasks.
However, teaching basic lessons enables learners to enrich their comprehensive knowledge and nurture their soft skills.First, learning a wide range of conventional subjects endows highs-school students with a comprehensive overview to enrich their knowledge and immersive personal skills. In fact, digital economists who expertise in Math may face some difficulties to deal with social-economial issues if they do not have any basic knowledge in social science. Furthermore, humanitarian subjects, such as history and literature, are helpful to mould childern's mind. In other words, humanitarian content shapens learners' morality and attidude to their relatives, peers, and older people.
In conclusion, there is an idea that teachers are advisible to teach their students up-to-date lessons in stead of static knowledge. Whereas I agree with this idea, I also think that knowlege from conventional subjects still needs to be maintained in the curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-09 | phuocthanhho | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | SOJI | 41 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ional currliculum cannot be overlooked. It is undeniable that offering students ...
^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'futures'' or 'future's'?
Suggestion: futures'; future's
...p-to-date lessons may facilitate them a futures preparation. To begin with, an updated ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 743, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d work with digitization-related tasks. However, teaching basic lessons enables ...
^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...knowledge and nurture their soft skills.First, learning a wide range of conventional ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir relatives, peers, and older people. In conclusion, there is an idea that tea...
^^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
...teach their students up-to-date lessons in stead of static knowledge. Whereas I agree with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, still, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81972789116 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24150373685 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625850340136 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1646988809 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.615384615 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3076923077 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200828834896 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690442044334 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407779491338 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112762936329 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04251033036 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.