The best way to reduce the number of traffic accidents is to make all young drivers complete a safe driving education course before being licensed to drive. To what extent do you agree?
The safety course on controlling the number of traffic incidents is vital. The most appropriate way to shrink the number of commuter accidents is to educate young drivers with a safe driving course before providing them license to run a vehicle on road. While safety course will educate rules and regulations of traffic laws, I think lane separation of different cars is necessary to limit the number of accidents.
On the one hand, lane segregation of different types of vehicle is important to maintain the discipline on-road and it will decrease the number of incidents. High-speed vehicles such as cars should have different lanes as compared with low-speed vehicles like heavy trucks, this step will minimize the traffic congestion on the different segments of roads. A mixed crowd of different size vehicles have always been a problem to tackle for traffic police as a consequence increases traffic jams and chances of accidents. However, such steps have already implemented on highway roads in some nations only, applying this step on city roads will improve the situation at a much better level.
On the other hand, educating young drivers a safety driving course may improve the situation as the person will follow traffic rules while driving. The safety course teaches them important aspects of driving such as following traffic rules and priorities safety all the time. More the safety less the chance of accidents, both aspects are inversely proportional. A survey revealed that educated drivers follow more traffic rules and minimize the chance of incidence as compared with illiterate drivers.
In conclusion, although the safe driving course will enhance the ability of young drivers while driving to priorities safety first and prevent an accident, I believe that different speed vehicles should be allowed to drive on different platforms so that smooth flow can be maintained to minimize the risk of accidents via collusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | Ja | 67 | view |
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 73
- Some people blame the government for the increase in childhood obesity while others think it is the parents’ fault. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Every year more and more students choose to study online rather than attend classes on campus. Why are students choosing to study online? What can universities do to attract students back to campus? 56
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssary to limit the number of accidents. On the one hand, lane segregation of dif...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the situation at a much better level. On the other hand, educating young drive...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27974276527 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65355731131 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501607717042 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9010747528 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262896545637 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11004200365 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102298186781 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190496523836 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10476137035 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.