In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
The number of elderly people joining old-age homes are on the rise in recent times. The expenses of such homes which include medical, food, stay, etc., need to be borne by the family of the person joining the home. In certain scenarios such as the individual is not having a family, the government needs to provide financial assistance.
To embark on, the cardinal reason why the family needs to bare the cost of stay in such homes is because when they can take care of aged people at home, still they prefer to send them to such assisted living facilities. Further, only people from affluent families send the old people to stay in such convalescent homes, so they are capable of baring the expenses incurred. For example, in a recent news article in 'Times of India' it states that a significant percentage of people joining old people's home are the ones whose kids are either settled abroad or having a nuclear family. As is the case, it is the family that needs to take care of financials of such people.
On the other hand, there are few elderly individuals who are orphans and at that age not everyone can fund their monthly expenses. In such a case, the government needs to step-up and provide the financial aid to support them. For instance, in a recent survey by an American institute, they stated that a large number of people are not physically fit enough to work and earn their bread after the age of 65. Hence, due to such factors, the helping hand of a government is highly appreciated.
To conclude, depending on the situation of the individual - considering physical and mental fitness, either the family or the government should take up the expenditure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Wajeeha Umer | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.What are the causes of this?What actions can be taken to solve this problem? 78
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers and does not benefit employers at all.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that a life is good for people as it is while others believe that constant change can be too demanding on people Discuss both views and give your opinion 75
- With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What solutions can you suggest to deal with thi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...hand, there are few elderly individuals who are orphans and at that age not everyone ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...an American institute, they stated that a large number of people are not physically fit enough to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, still, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72354948805 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52156234188 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532423208191 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0322954264 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225368020693 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830989153469 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321866036429 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128877004473 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464424320207 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.