Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world's fuel resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world's fuel resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are few individuals who argue that there should be restriction on air travel due to the pollution emitted. This essay will explain why I agree to this opinion by stating two major concerns of using aeroplanes.

To embark on, the cardinal problems of aircrafts are climate change and water pollution. With regards to the former, when jet fuel is burnt, carbon molecules are released, when these combined with oxygen in air, it produces carbon dioxide, which generates greenhouse gases. As a result, there are climatic changes such as increase in ultraviolet rays due to depletion of ozone layer cause by greenhouse gas emissions. As for water pollution, more often lubricants and other chemicals such as deicing fluids from aircrafts fall on ground, thereby, with the flow of water-storm runoff mix with nearby water streams, causing polluted water. Accordingly, damage occurs to the planet earth because of aforesaid factors.

From my perspective, although I agree air travel should be controlled, there needs to other alternatives as well. While restriction on international flights will be too much of an ask, domestic frequency can be minimized. This can be achieved by couple of reasons such as increasing air travel cost and investment in alternative modes of transport such as roadways and waterways. In contrast, in the past, travelers through airways was very negligible and there was paucity of pollution. Futuristic solution to this obstacle is investing in X-planes. These are developed by use of batteries, so the percentage of emissions are comparatively very low. For instance, Boeing airlines conducted a test run and results state that these plane models produce 20% lesser carbon elements per single traveler.

In conclusion, my view-point is that there should be a restriction on travel through air by extortionate pricing of tickets on domestic travel and investing on electric aeroplanes.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-14 A VATSAL KUMAR 89 view
Essays by user A VATSAL KUMAR :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ternational flights will be too much of an ask, domestic frequency can be minimized. T...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, so, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3498349835 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91510139073 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4984182712 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.066666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193647747315 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624384709957 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629076075179 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132202093833 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469900446875 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.