In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experiences
The rapid increase in ageing population in recent years has placed more importance on elderly homes around the cities of Britain. There are many privately owned homes as well as state sponsored homes. In my personal view, these centres should be financially supported by the government.
Firstly, the majority of the elders go in search of homes for elders, mainly due to the disputes with their family members. As a result, the family members of these elders will not support financially for their day to day living. Due to this, government should take initiativies to financially support these elders.
Secondly, the elders are the senior citizens of this country. Their tax income has been invested for the country's development so far. Hence, the return from those investments should be rewarded the to the elders, who have contributed towards major portion of tax income.
Thirdly, the financial situation of their family will also restrict allocation towards medical and well being of older member of that family. Especially, the medical care, hospitalisation and drugs are highly expensive today. Only the families with high living standards could afford this.
In summary, the older generation of the country should be financially supported by the government. This is mainly, due to respective family's wealth position may differ, pay back their tax contribution and personal family disputes may push them to be alone. Moreover, state sponsored centres will help the country to improve the living standards of their citizens
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Wajeeha Umer | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letter.1. Introduce yourself2. Describe your plans for the party3. Invite your neighb 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these views and 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in summary, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34979423868 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68313388371 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584362139918 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4509762147 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183944635861 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618552960002 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042307577258 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977839260647 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341473745994 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.