Cashless society
Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of cashless markets is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that electronic card can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a bank card can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of financial transactions, as well as a secured credit facility, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered real financial benefits. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both online money and financial conditions apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a plastic card might increase the consequences of being fraud. Moreover, fundamental aspects of online shopping could relate to this reality that the demerits of online transactions pertain to hacking the bank details. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using e-money is correlated negatively with internet hacking. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of using the visa card.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of credit card far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cashless transfers prove the significance of payment methods, but also pinpoint social implications.
- music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life 88
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport 63
- extreme sports like skiing, rafting, diving should be banned. agree or disagree? 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- experimental learning, traditional learning in high school and university. agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55642023346 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18816453498 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649805447471 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.597192787 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158913473478 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528105747124 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953687985966 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915242468776 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885257497777 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.