At the outset of the new millennium, giving prioritisation to watching television over studies has become common trend among children. It is stated that in these days, huge amount of time spend in front of television by school going toddlers. Nonetheless, the placement of books will not going to be predicted with television as a learning method. These circumstances causing illiteracy among growing once. I partially agree with the statement and my partial agreement will be articulated in following paragraphs prior to reaching conclusion.
It is noteworthy to mention that television cannot take books place due to some reasons. The most worthmentioning factor is that development of imagination skills can only be seen by reading books which helps the student to become more creative to understand the concept of learning. Furthermore, learning through books do not harm children's physical health which pave the ways for having good concentration while reading. For example, in India, majority of pupils have been using books for learning and they are considered more creative and knowledgeable as compared to those who adopting television for learning. Hence, it is enough to prove how books tremendously contributing in learning.
Although books are providing appropriate results for learners we cannot neglect the benefits of learning through television. In these days, educational programs have introduced on TV which offering knowledge in regard to animal species, climate change, farming, inventions, achievements of players and business field. These sorts of informations can attract the students as they are already addictive to television and they would find them interesting due to having the opportunity to learn everything through video system. For instance, in most developed nations toddlers prefer to learn everything with the help of TV because they consider that books are boring method of learning and understanding. Thus, it can be said that television learning is also proved superficial for many children.
In conclusion, after having look at both the sides of learning I personally feel that television programs are superior to getting knowledge for those who find books uninteresting. However, learning with books as good as TV and the place of books cannot be taken by any modern technology owing to the positive outcomes these provides.
- Many people buy products that they do not really need and replace old products with new ones unnecessarily Why do people but things they do not really need Do you think this is good thing 84
- Nowadays we see an increase in social problems involving teenagers Many believe that it is because parents spend more time at work and less with their children Do you agree or disagree 67
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers 84
- Sports should be made mandatory for all children as it helps in physical health Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...heless, the placement of books will not going to be predicted with television as a le...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 795, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o proved superficial for many children. In conclusion, after having look at both...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, look, nonetheless, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49180327869 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02127485753 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6851345044 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.235294118 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252762814166 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851977216054 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429289537002 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160157652587 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258305818568 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.