Computer is the most amazing device invented by human. All of us know learning process has drastically changed with the introduction of computers. Knowledge grasping through this device is interesting and enthusiastic. But, still human interactions cannot be replaced by computers. Therefore, in my opinion, computers can be used in updating knowledge but can’t be used to replace the teacher.
To begin with, nobody can’t deny acquisition of knowledge through computers are more fun and easier. Digital books, simulators and other websites provide lot of information to the student with in a single click. The materials are accessible from anywhere at any time. The amount of resources stored in this device is unimaginable. Human being can’t process this amount of data.
But, there are number of students in a class room with different capacity levels. Computers are still not capable enough to explain concepts according to the intelligent level of the users. This is possible for a teacher. The class room teacher can understand the reactions, facial expression and capability of students. Then they can help the student further in understanding the complex theory.
Hence, teachers should understand their role in present classroom. They are required to update and improve their computer literacy. The learning process main task of the teacher is to act as a problem solver and let the students find the details by themselves.
In conclusion, the teachers play an important role no matter how complex the computer becomes. The human interaction cannot be replaced by a machine.
- The mark of a successful person is to be wealthy and have a successful career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. 73
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economy in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss. 78
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 78
- Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or DVDs Do you agree or disagree 88
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'in conclusion', 'in my opinion', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251700680272 0.247107183377 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.155533422707 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0850340136054 0.0946595960268 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0408163265306 0.0501214627716 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0238095238095 0.0437548338989 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108843537415 0.122226691241 89% => OK
Participles: 0.047619047619 0.0403226058552 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91680269686 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0238095238095 0.0326793684256 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.108843537415 0.0861772015684 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.030612244898 0.021408717616 143% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00340136054422 0.011925033212 29% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1608.0 1933.35771543 83% => OK
No of words: 251.0 316.048096192 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.40637450199 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20517956788 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.450199203187 0.374742101984 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.362549800797 0.28420135186 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.258964143426 0.203846283523 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159362549801 0.137316102897 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91680269686 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.037074148 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581673306773 0.56093040696 104% => OK
Word variations: 59.0652106065 60.7387585426 97% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 12.55 20.7743622355 60% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2928349538 49.517814964 51% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4 127.492653851 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.55 20.7743622355 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.55 0.814263465372 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 48.8049800797 49.1944974215 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.76470588235 1.69124875643 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333625475526 0.332605444948 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.083476493397 0.102741220458 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.07558594375 0.0668466124924 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.465652766116 0.534860350844 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138810099998 0.148594505496 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103700445011 0.134430193775 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582710539981 0.0742795772207 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.338183695857 0.324371583561 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0468414763156 0.0638462369009 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20196940397 0.228012699653 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112269131675 0.058150111329 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.41683366733 322% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.