Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think is a positive or negative development?
It is quite often said that world has become a village and everyone is living more or less similar way. Moreover, people across the countries buy the same items and use it in defined manner. Some people see this as a negative development, but I believe that world is most likely to get benefit owing to usage of similar products.
People who see this as negative trend have some rationale behind this. Firstly, glimpse of local culture is diminishing day by day because people use the imported items or buy items from multinational companies’ outlet. Multinational national companies have standardization in their products globally, resulting same kind of products is sold and used by the people. For example, my grandfather bought the fridge which was local made and looks distinctive but such fridge have been phased out and available one in market are identical to being sold in other countries. Secondly, local craft and industry is dying because they are not able to compete with the global giants. Global giants have big market accessibility in contrast to local entrepreneurs and have more competitive edge. Consequently, local players are either shut their business or merged with global companies.
However, there are different benefits of same product being sold worldwide. It not only brings the standardization in items but also provide an opportunity to underdeveloped countries to use quality products. It is generally seen that people in underdeveloped countries are rarely exposed to quality products by local vendor. Incorporation of identical style of products exposes the local vendor. For instance, African automobile company provides the safety features at very high cost, while arrival of multinational company forced them provide extra features within same price.
In the conclusion, using same item worldwide certainly affecting the native environment and traditional products but it is important for every individual to be aware about the quality products and use it in best possible manner and this is definitely the positive trend.
- Write a letter to the company. In your letterdescribe the benefits of sponsoring the sports teamsummarise the benefits of paying for the concertssay how you think the company should spend the money 89
- You are currently renting an apartment with your family. However, you have been relocated to another city for work. Your rental contracts does not end for another five months which means you need to break the contract early.Write a letter to the landlord 89
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 84
- Some people believe that the government should pay for and offer housing to people who lost their homes or cannot afford them To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support it 84
- Write a letter to your friend who is working in multinational company. In your letter- Tell him/her that there is a job vacancy in their company.- Say how you found out about the job.- Ask for help with your job application.- Explain why you are intereste 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 702, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'marketed'.
Suggestion: marketed
...e global giants. Global giants have big market accessibility in contrast to local entr...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...e about the quality products and use it in best possible manner and this is definitely ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37230769231 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95144774424 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2436823334 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235396418529 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758936337451 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517501569517 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147385137 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808614729359 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.