A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is a contentious debate regard to whether diversity of nationalities would result in more interesting society and more developed as well or not. According to the results of great deal of research which have been done on this matter, I totally agree with this subject.
The main reason for believing this is that gathering variety of different people from different countries leads to make a sense of community among them and result in more personal interactions. This promote the sense of humanity and friendship between all citizens. Young people will learn about the importance of cooperation and also about the value of individuals as a human, no matter where they come from. However, it should be stuck in the mind that achieving this goal depends on the level of social service which is provided by the government for all immigrants. This refers to all aspects of a public welfare such as the equal job or education opportunity or medical services. When there is no discrimination among a native and a foreign, people would be more loyal to their country which can benefit the society by boosting the incentives for construction.
On the other hand, one of the merits of this situation is related to the amount of progress that caused by immigrants. Canada is an outstanding instance. To illustrate, the government of Canada accept a considerable number of immigrant every year. As a result, the population has increased significantly that caused to more force work. It is noteworthy to say that there should be some restrict requirement for entry such as high education or skilled worker. If immigrant meet the criteria, the development of the country will be ensure.
In conclusion, I believe that variety of nationality result in more interesting and more developed country as this circumstance lead more cooperation among people and also more skilled labor. Given this situation, it seems that government play a vital role in this situation by providing an appropriate level of welfare.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | RSudhir | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-08 | Saira Faiz | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 43
- Nowadays more and more people want to get things done instantly Why is it Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors singers or footballers They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people 65
- Some people think that giving their children a certain amount of money every week will help them have fewer financial problems in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- There have been several complaints about the reception area where visitors to your company arrive Your manager has asked you to suggest how the reception area could be improved describe the complaints that have been made say why the reception area is impo 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1329305136 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93504803827 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537764350453 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8591050268 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16708815494 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538480143338 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779757615633 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119085388648 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514413900152 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.