The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve crime.
Do you agree or disagree?
There is an issue about the benefits security technology has on the level of crime. Some safety keepers say that the usage of modern gadgets has led to the low number of crimes. This essay agrees with their point of view.
Let us start with reasons why some security guards state that the number of crime decreases due to the usage of technology in security. The first reason is that security technology is widespread. For example, cameras are present in almost every corner, so many offenders find it nearly impossible to escape their sight to break a law. Another reason is that It can work without breaks. Pieces of protective technology, such as security alarms, generally function for 24 hours, because, in contrast to human guards, they need neither sleep nor food. Furthermore, it is too sophisticated to deactivate. Security cameras can be turned off by police officers at the police station; therefore, criminals cannot mostly deactivate them before entering a house illegally.
However, some police officers argue that sometimes technology has little positive effect on crime rate. Firstly, many criminals can stop it functioning with anti-security gadgets. Professional burglars frequently apply handmade devices to deceive both modern cameras and alarms to steal jewelry, so technology cannot offer absolute safety. Secondly, every technology has blind spots. The outlaw is mainly aware of technological flaws, such as blind spots, which allow them to fulfill their devil plans without a fear of being noticed. Moreover, many criminals are normally related to the victims. Offenders often know their targets and what protective measures they use, so they can either deactivate or evade these measures easily.
In conclusion, although some police officers advocate that technology has a negligible impact on the level of crime, I think that it deters many criminals and significantly lowers the crime rate.
- Should the international community do more to tackle the threat of global warming? 56
- Is virtual reality more than just for fun? 89
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 67
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 89
- Some people believe that social networking sites are not doing enough to protect users' privacy. However, others believe that it is not the responsibility of the sites; instead, users should be more careful about what they make available online.Discu 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
There is an issue about the benefits security technology has on the level of...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3597359736 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69943594812 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0961293071 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180522795863 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550383568069 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574478128294 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122005809204 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312804891834 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.