Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In recent years, It is an undeniable fact that our life has gone vividly through extensive alternations since the Internet evolved into being. Moreover, this raises the question of whether governments should concentrate on improving Internet access rather than public transportation. When it comes to my stance, by weighing up the pros and cons, I definitely hold the idea that as the vital function of the online network gained recognition in every society and interest in possessing such public access has become popular in recent years, so they should invest much more money in providing internet access for two chief reasons which I will explore in the following.
First and foremost, the prime reason why I am of such a belief is that as all governments have their own limitations to properly prioritize projects that time and cost are the most important concerns which every administrator must rightly consider. Besides, improving Internet access is simply applicable to a wide variety of areas. Hence, these reasons indeed motivate authorities to strongly support the posses of making Internet connection available in cities. What I mean is that every state can completely carry out these plans in many regions without serious difficulty by spending less money in a short period of time.
On the other hand, another paramount fact that must be cataloged here is that having access to the Internet provides people with the appealing opportunity to facilitate a great extent of tasks like shopping, banking, working, and educating which were really cumbersome and time-consuming. Which is why the Internet plays a pivotal role in contemporary societies. Subsequently, these situations cause the availability of the Internet to become one of the most significant aspects to measure the level of welfare for experts. A simple example which will suffice to illustrate this attention is that people who live in distance areas face a lot of problems such as not having a bank, library, and school which almost could be covered by providing internet access.
In conclusion, according to the aforementioned reasons, I absolutely concur with the initial statement and believe that having the accessible Internet brings about a harbinger of far better times to come for people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | engr.husni | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | hamidreza89 | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | Ehsan Razmara | 56 | view |
- TPO 42 task 1 85
- some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. others believe that it is better to spend this time doing something related to the schoolw 95
- TPO 43- Agnostids 83
- TPO30 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...olved into being. Moreover, this raises the question of whether governments should concentrate on impro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...culty by spending less money in a short period of time. On the other hand, another paramoun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, moreover, really, so, i mean, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27472527473 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86327928303 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618131868132 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.7342065145 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242679806191 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845711820993 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059787144463 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135913248327 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432854028154 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.