Eating at home is better than eating out.
There are three aspects that make eating at home much better than eating out. To begin with, foods cooked in our house are healthier than those in restaurants. At home, we can control the amount of spices and oil added to the dishes so that we can balance our diet to meet our demands. An increasing number of people believe that foodborne diseases are caused by the contamination of food from restaurants or sidewalk eateries since when eating out people may not know the exact origin of each ingredient. While preparing food ourselves, we can directly choose fresh vegetables or meat in markets. Secondly, eating at home is less expensive than dining outside. Clearly, when we have a meal at home we need to prepare the dishes by ourselves and we also garnish and do washing-up. As a result, we don’t have to pay for the expensive meals at a restaurant and other purposes including the tip, the labor of waiters and chefs. Finally, it is very comfortable for people who eat at home. Instead of dressing up and behaving well in public we may do everything we like and wear casual clothes, even pyjamas. Moreover, at home we do not have to worry about disturbing other people and can watch TV, read the newspapers or laugh loudly. It is supposed that family meals creates a cozy atmosphere. Members comfortably talk and discuss their days and troubles together. Overall, the benefits of eating a
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | thuyduong675 | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | DJ | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | Arun Kani | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-25 | Usman Asif | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | Shweta406 | 82 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72950819672 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58950240567 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6756533191 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4285714286 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372609755347 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151928893426 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199893531266 0.0667982634062 299% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.372609755347 0.151304729494 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.