Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbles and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this Information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In this contemporary day and age, society is polarized into two groups almost equally regarding the notion that whether a company needs to take interest in the personal preference of employees. Some argue that employers should only ask professional interest. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion later.
There are myriad things to be shared in the favor of asking extra information. To begin with, multi-national companies can identify the best match for a position. For example, a job that requires traveling across the mega cities in different countries would not offer to committed persons. Another rationale that holds me to patrol is the retention rates of an employee. This is why the stability of the married person for the position is higher compared to a single individual. Moreover, employers use this personal information for the refreshment of the worker. For instance, a company organized an annual party which involves sports and activities that people like the most in the survey.
On the paradoxical side, other people believe that employers might discriminate job seekers. To epitome, if an employer is interested in cricket then their decision might be inclined towards same-minded people. Thus, it is an injustice to the most prominent attendant. Another reason is data piracy, some companies buying personal data from other organizations to identify potential future customers.
After discussing both sides, I conclude that the advantages are outweighed the demerit of asking the personal data; employers can find the correct candidate and reduce repetitive hiring for the same position.
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books boughtover the internet.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 84
- More and more people are working from home rather than at a workplace Some people say this will bring benefits to the workers and their families but other think it will bring stress to the home Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Today, The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 76
- Nowadays as a part of the education process students are working for a company for a short period of time without pay Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this Give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36964980545 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86094637422 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642023346304 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1104009105 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352231202209 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100482740316 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697631701572 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180379918657 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046640320097 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.