Normally a job seek would not reveal personal information in a resume when applying for a job; however, some employers may enquary details such as hobbies, specialities and marrital status. Some people think this is acceptable to prompt private information; whereas, others reject this action. Personally, I agree with the latter approach.
Some people believe the reason that human resource managers request for personal information in resume is because it it essential and useful for deciding a potential employee from numerous candidates. The exployer may deem a specific personality is suitable for the job according to the hobbies of candidates. In addition, a employer may prefer single person than married people. For example, a company in China recruits only single female for secritery. Nonetheless, I oppose the approach that companies hire employees in accordance with its perference on hobbies and marrital status, which is irrelevant to work.
Indeed, asking peosonal information in curriculum vitae is a violation of privacy. The sole requirement for a job is qualification and personal information is relevant to it. As a matter of fact, law prohibits employers to request peosonal information from personnels. Besides, offering a job according to personal information would produce bias in the process, which is detrimental for a fair environment. Therefore, a majority of people disagree with the request of personal information, not only for the protection of privacy but also for maintain a healthy employment environment.
To summarize, I believe it is illegal for employers to ask personal information from employees or job seekers. Rejection to this request is reasonable and this behavior will protect the right of employees.
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions. 73
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000 87
- the bar chart shows scores of 3 teams a, b nd c over four different seasons. summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant. 61
- In the past many people had skills such as making their own clothes and doing repairs to things in the house. In many countries, nowadays, skills like these are disappearing.Why do you think this change is happening?How far is this situation true in your 61
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...rsonal information in resume is because it it essential and useful for deciding a pot...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the hobbies of candidates. In addition, a employer may prefer single person than ...
^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the protection of privacy but also for maintain a healthy employment environmen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54275092937 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11801741281 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557620817844 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1602578479 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392499542107 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131628982723 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074259240683 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248778480401 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03892459054 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.