The whole world is affected due to drastic change in the ecosystem. Developed and developing nations unification can resolve these global problems by providing financial support as well as spreading ecological awareness using international platforms. This write up endeavors to highlight the reasons why collaboration of different countries is important to resist the environment problems.
Foremost, due to rapidly growing population, deforestation and soil erosion rate is increased exponentially to fulfil the basic necessity of shelter and food which leads to desertification. Most of the developed countries implemented population control measures but this is not the situation in poorer nations. The involvement of experts from rich nations to support in curbing these national level problems will be beneficial. For example, TB was a most rampant disease of the twentieth century, but UN initiative to provide free vaccination and treatment to the diagnosed patients all around the world, help in vanishing it.
Additionally, the major threats of climate change or global warming is the high frequency of natural disasters like floods, earthquake etc which leads to economic loss in the rich countries and human lives in poorer nations. The financial support from rich countries can help in deploying proper measures in the risk prone areas. For instance, Gulf nations support Indian government financially at the time of high floods and cyclones in coastal areas of West Bengal and Kerala.
The irony is that those countries that have contributed least to climate change, are the ones that are being hit the hardest in terms of loss of life from disasters. To conclude, collaboration among all nations with proper initiatives at global platform can help in recovering from the ecological imbalances and consequences.
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters 87
- People who read of pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV To what extent do you agree 56
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion. 67
- Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organized group activities in their free time Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own Discuss both these views and give your o 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solve these global problems by providing financial support as well as spreading e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...around the world, help in vanishing it. Additionally, the major threats of clima...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53571428571 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04606638276 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1943283314 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0812481302765 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288201016109 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0163863940825 0.0667982634062 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504257639824 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00734301545539 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.