Globalization applies majorly to corporate sector more than retail sector. With emerging economy, we can consider benefits of it as helping to country growth in terms of economy, tourism, trade, wealth. We certainly can also consider its limitations which may lead to pollution, deforestation and cross-culture malpractices, improper labor practices.
Firstly, considering the positive side, globalization is certainly required for developing countries. Consequently, Import grades can be reduced when there is mutual agreement with both countries. Further, More International Giants like Amazon would invest their money in country. In addition, the setup of new branches in several countries would enable employment of local resources, access to global products at ease and less cost. Moreover, majority of people are interested in buying products which are accepted internationally and are quality certified. However, the technology has improved that people can book their products in Mobile apps or just call Echo Apps and make an order.
On contrast, considering the negative side, globalization helps richer people grow in wealth and poorer people to suffer. This certainly helps corporate who need to expand their business across countries. But, it leaves local entrepreneurs or small shops, getting critically affected by their growing business for years. People often prefer Mobile app which is easier to book, rather buy from local shops and buy products waiting in queues. On the other way, conversely, returning a product to local shop is much easier and we can negotiate and get good quality product as we expect in local shop. This is not possible for Internationally established online markets. Also, as the product pass quality tests does not guarantee that it is as per our expectation and our culture needs. Most of products brought using globalization has been developed based on country it has been manufactured. Moreover, They might not be manufactured keeping in mind of country road pitfalls, frequent digging of roads, traffic hazards, and other country related issues. Most importantly, cross culture issues are high and make ethical problems in country. Also, Pollution levels are peaking to major level, if new companies are setup. Most of their chemicals are let out to lakes. Further more, labors are expected to work in global timings.
In conclusion, there are benefits like, increased trades, communication and corporate profits. We need to favor the long living culture also to be followed. Globalization helps in one way to be a priceless boon to corporate. It makes local shops to suffer in establishing their market and is certainly a curse for them.
- You have recently started work in a new company.•explain why you changed jobs•describe your new job•tell him/her your other news 73
- The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously? 73
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped?Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 784, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the products') or simply say ''Most products''.
Suggestion: Most of the products; Most products
... our expectation and our culture needs. Most of products brought using globalization has been de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44736842105 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93050873719 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588516746411 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2089967684 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5769230769 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0769230769 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26923076923 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101587424594 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291850732131 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420433758471 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662236241278 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190602783137 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.