Every country should have a free-health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that every nation in this world should provide therapeutic facilities free of cost to their citizens. However, this would give rise to the unavailability of specific supplies in different locations due to its higher price tag. This essay agrees that governing authorities should provide health care service to the unprivileged section to maintain a healthy society, and it should be paid for the rich crowd because of the incapability of governing authorities to make accessible expensive
health care procedure to all.
Admittedly, giving the right of access to preventive treatment by poverty-stricken people would help to develop a healthy nation. That is to say, a majority of people can not afford the cost of getting themselves treated for various ailments owing to the lack of money. Therefore, providing all disease-related facilities free of outlay can help the poor communities to maintain their health, which further gives rise to a better community. Apart from this, some issues are viral if these do not get cured in a given time can cast an adverse effect on the whole society. Taking dengue fever as an example, masses suffering from this particular issue is responsible
for transmitting the symptoms to others who are in touch with that person.
Apparently, making cure reachable to all sections without charging any fee would put a huge burden on the administrative bodies. In other words, due to the advancement in techniques, various procedures for making individuals well involve a lot of effort and money, so investing in this field by government alone would put financial stress on the nation. Thus, charging some expenses for the residents, who are at the higher rungs of the socioeconomic ladder would alleviate this grave difficulty. Moreover, wealth extracted from the public will give help to invent more research in the domain of medicinal science that solely benefits the inhabitants of that tribe. For example, in India, governing bodies have opened up various pharmaceutical centers for poor persons in 2014, where they can get full privileges of all services and a survey conducted in 2019 has revealed that multitudes are more healthy as compared to the past times.
On balance, giving free medical solutions to the public is the responsibility of the authorities. However, this phenomenon would create the obstacle of the absence of the most important facilities in some places because of the price involved. In my view, these services should be complimentary for poor folk and appropriate charges should be applied to those who can afford them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | Agus Ismansyah | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | mehjabin | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-21 | surajgupta1993 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | jksidhu | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-06 | shain | 73 | view |
- Most Modern Families have both parents working and as a result children spend less time with their parents What is the reason for this What problems can this cause 73
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- You live in a room in a college where you share it with another student You find it very difficult to study and work there because your roommate always has friends visiting He she has parties in the room and sometimes borrows your things without asking yo 89
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities with other people rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Young people prefer listening to music rather than listening to the news on the radio Is this positive or a negative trend provide reasons and examples for your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, in my view, in other words, on the whole, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21718377088 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92694468695 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568019093079 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4876957229 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.625 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1875 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172446333178 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530059361082 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511038111216 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875499319347 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689105162566 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.