Far too little has been done to prevent animals and plants from dying out, although people have been aware of this problem for a long time. Why do people do so little about it? Give your suggestions on how to solve this problem.
It is irrefutable that many animals and plants have died due to less importance given to them. Though, people have perceived this issue but have not done anything to improve the situation. This essay intends to delve into reasons why people contribute least towards it, and what can be done to fix this trouble.
In this era, individuals are busy in their lives, striving to improve the present for a better future. People tend to be busy due to hectic schedules in weekdays, and partying or relaxing to give peace to their mind on weekends. Moreover, governments strive to facilitate people in several ways, such as by constructing roads to decrease traffic congestion and organising free health check-ups for their better health. Consequently, Trees are cut-down to provide big roads to the public, and animals get no attention from people. For example, every year, 2 million trees are removed in New Delhi to decrease the challenge of traffic on roads.
Crucial steps need to be taken, such as planting more trees and providing shelter to animals to avoid severe consequences, which we might see in the future. The government of a nation should take the responsibility to plant as many trees as possible. Besides, the government should provide food and shelter to animals along with essential medical help, so that they live comfortably, and are safe and healthy. Furthermore, states should encourage people to plant trees in their gardens or nearby areas, and adopt human-friendly animals such as dogs and cats. Therefore, the world would have millions of trees planted annually and save animals significantly. To illustrate, the Canadian government provides free health services to pets and encourage people to maintain their gardens to avoid any kind of penalty.
To conclude, trees and animals deserve better treatment because they are an important part of the world. People should take necessary steps to maintain greenery and wildlife in order not to see a future with lack of oxygen and animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-20 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-14 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- The government should not waste money on arts as this money would be better spent on other projects like sanitation or infrastructure Do you agree with the above statement 67
- Some people think that the best way to get the news is through newspapers while others think it is through online media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers 73
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 80
- With access to the internet and social media websites many children are exposed to a number of dangerous situations Adults should thus limit access to the internet for their children Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... To conclude, trees and animals deserve better treatment because they are an important...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12462006079 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71125301565 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568389057751 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0450948251 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184007017165 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630099536747 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435874022606 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116257987647 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707852213673 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.