Few people devote their time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effects this has on individual and society in general

In the recent era, more and more people are running behind their passion and career goals. These has led to a situation where less persons are spending time for hobies. This essay will discuss the reasons behind this and its overall impact on individual as well as on society.

To begin with, due to advancement in education and technolgy, the world has become more competitive and opportunistic. So for survival, people will indulge themselves more in professional lives instead of using some leisure time in doing some recreational activities. Moreover, due to their hactic work schedual even if they have some free time, they will waste it by watching any sport games or art activity on their phone rather than doing it by themselves. These are the primary factors for reduction in time people used to spent for their hobbies.

However, due to this negative atttude of individuals, there can be ample amount of consequences that are related to society and in general. First of all, the stress levels could be on higher side which is harmful for everyone. The cases of poor mental health and psychological issues are going to increase day by day. Besides these, the society will be deprived of enthusiastic and creative people. Recently there are surging in suicidal activies as well. All these negative effects leads to more negativity in society and in individual also.

To conclude, running behind career and paying less attention to hobbies are devastating. Poor mental health and other psychological issues are major drawbacks of this scenario. Atleast spending one evening in an entire week can be blissful for optimum health.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun persons is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...als. These has led to a situation where less persons are spending time for hobies. T...
^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...negativity in society and in individual also. To conclude, running behind career ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in general, as well as, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08888888889 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66073414171 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2470928922 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196065007184 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565392704142 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481846301051 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111446851564 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380136860434 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.