Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people ate only the local food produced by farmers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern days, supermarkets are stocked with imported food goods, and it is believed that people should consume locally produced food as it would have positive repercussions on the environment as well as the economy. I partially agree with this notion.
On the one hand, by transporting regionally cultivated food products to other nations, the local farmers are being benefited financially as their consumable merchandises are getting sold in a foreign currency in a way higher price in comparison to the local markets. Further, this trend has also contributed towards the nation's economy. Moreover, there are numerous food alternatives from multiple nations accessible for the people, and an individual can have a way to a diversity of fruits and vegetables, which were never achievable in the past. The dragon fruit is an excellent illustration of this advancement as people in India have never even heard about this unique fruit earlier. However, now it has a place in nearly every neighbourhood shop and market.
On the other hand, undoubtedly, transporting food commodities from one nation to another has detrimental consequences on the environment as it involves the use of multiple types of transportation facilities such as air, water and road, which has not only intensified the product's price for consumers but also escalated the level of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere due to massive utilization of vehicles that emit toxic fumes into the air. Furthermore, this inclination has also influenced local people to consume foreign cuisines, and in many cases, they tend to eat foreign cuisines more than their traditional food, which is not a good practice for any nation's culture and traditional values.
In conclusion, while i agree that the global business of food products has financial perks for the local growers and also benefits for the people as it opens the gate for several food categories, it is steadily degrading the climate health as well as such food commodities are not pocket-friendly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | randhawa.harpreet91@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | minoozafaryan | 56 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns leaving only old people in countryside What problems does this cause What can be done to solve this problem 78
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social and others think that it has made him less social. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 100
- Film is a less important form of art than literature and painting To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company In your letter Describe the item you lost Explain how you lost it Tell the insurance company what you would like them to do 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... trend has also contributed towards the nations economy. Moreover, there are numerous f...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 22, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...onal values. In conclusion, while i agree that the global business of food ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30650154799 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0188187566 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.000889827 49.4020404114 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.4 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24116371398 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865623583188 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762249172911 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164153246943 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552628141979 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.