Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people ate only the local food produced by farmers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern days, supermarkets are stocked with imported food products, and it is believed that people should consume locally produced food as it would have positive repercussions on the environment as well as the economy. I partially agree with this notion.
On the one hand, by exporting locally cultivated food products globally, the local farmers are being benefited financially as their consumable merchandises are getting sold in a foreign currency in a way higher price in comparison to the local markets. Further, this trend has also contributed towards the nation's economy. Moreover, there are numerous food options from various nations available for the people, and an individual can have access to the variety of fruits and vegetables, which were never possible in the past. The dragon fruit is an ideal example of this advancement as people in India have never even heard about this special fruit earlier. However, now it has a place in almost every local shop and market.
On the other hand, undoubtedly, transporting food commodities from one nation to another has detrimental impacts on the environment as it involves the use of myriad transportation facilities such as air, water and road, which not only escalated the product's price for consumers but also increases the level of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere due to massive utilization of vehicles that emit toxic fumes into the air. Furthermore, this trend has also influenced local people to consume foreign cuisines, and in many cases, they tend to consume foreign cuisines more than their traditional food, which is not a good practice for any nation's culture and traditional values.
In conclusion, while i agree that the global transaction of food products has financial perks for the local farmers and also benefits for the people as it opens the gate for several food varieties, it is steadily degrading the environment condition as well as such products are not pocket-friendly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-09 | randhawa.harpreet91@gmail.com | 84 | view |
2019-11-09 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2019-11-09 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2019-10-03 | minoozafaryan | 56 | view |
- People generating lot of trash these days. What are the causes and solutions. 11
- Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- You have borrowed something from your friend and it got damaged Write a letter to a friend In your letter apologize for damaging the product explain what happened say how are you going to fix the issue 73
- Some people prefer to spend more time improving their careers Others think that it s more important to spend time with family and friends Discuss both views and give your own opinion 93
- Today more and more people choose to live by themselves What are the causes of this Is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... trend has also contributed towards the nations economy. Moreover, there are numerous f...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 22, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...onal values. In conclusion, while i agree that the global transaction of fo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26265822785 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85846742221 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.141359726 49.4020404114 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.3 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24406066695 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900156810791 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714975906741 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165285694616 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489350569641 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.