Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?
There is a controversy about the ability to speak freely in a democratic community. Some politicians say that there should be limits on this ability, while some journalists believe that it should be unlimited. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of complete liberty.
Let us start with the reasons why some politicians state that governments should control the ability to express opinions. The first reason is that citizens may fall victim of extreme groups. Many people may be convinced to act with weapons against officials, when they listen to some destructive organizations, such as ISIS and AL-Qaeda. Another reason is that the right for privacy will be often neglected. Many celebrities and politicians, for example, complain about the intrusion into their private life by paparazzi, because the distinction between freedom of speech and individual rights is often obscure.
However, some journalists argue that officials should impose no restrictions on the right to speak openly. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, freedom of speech leads to transparency of government. If media, for instance, highlights the act of bribery or injustice, people become aware of it and show their resentment to the government, which then investigates it and arrest the officials involved. Consequently, before taking money money from interested people illegally, the official think of the repercussions. Secondly, it gives people a sense of importance in society. People feel more confident and responsible for the future of the country, if they can express their concerns to the public openly. Therefore, they either take more responsibility at work or ask protection from authorities.
In conclusion, even though some politicians state that the government should limit freedom of speech to protect their voters, I think that the ability to express thoughts should be absolutely available.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-23 | maya ulagappan | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | skan | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | astrlw@hotmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Sumit Das | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Sumit Das | 61 | view |
- What are the pros and cons for children of watching television? 78
- A friend you met last year has invited you to visit him/her in his/her country. You have never been there before and need some information before you leave.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:request advise about a gift for his/her familyask abo 78
- Prison is the best punishment for criminals. Discuss. 84
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letterintroduce yourselfdescribe your plans for the partyinvite your neighbour to com 78
- You have recently moved into a new house You want to tell your friend about your good news Write to your friend In the letter Describe the house Describe the neighbourhood Invite your friend to come and see the house 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will often be
...er reason is that the right for privacy will be often neglected. Many celebrities and politic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: money
...s involved. Consequently, before taking money money from interested people illegally, the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46864686469 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96749409371 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580858085809 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2360114724 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0709239224838 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259645697452 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607646534718 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501805221598 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374531899548 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.