Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility. To what extent do you agree?
There is a controversial issue about the responsibility of tourists. Some ecologists state that they should take both social and environmental obligations. In this essay, I will agree with their point of view.
Let us start with reasons why some ecologists propagate that people in other countries should be responsible for local communities and environment. The first reason is that they tend to behave courteously in tourist destinations, if they accept the difference of social aspects. Tourists usually behave with respect to locals, as soon as they accept the culture of the country they visit, no matter how different it may look from what they used to seeing in their home country. Another reason is that they become more eco-friendly. Tourism frequently cause considerable damage to local ecosystem, but as tourists become accountable for local nature, there environmental situation will improve. As a result, when tourists take obligation for the communities and ecological condition of the country they visit, the resentment from local communities will become lower.
However, some businessmen argue that tourists should not made socially as well as environmentally responsible. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, tourists pay for all the discomfort they create to locals. Tourists want to relax in other countries, and any attempts to restrict their desire by these obligations would deter them from visiting that country again. Secondly, local authorities should take responsibilities for social or environmental impact caused by tourists. Officials should protect communities from the annoyance of tourists, if they do not want to interact with them. They also should solve ecological problems due to tourism in the area, since they receive enough money from this industry in the form of taxes. Therefore, it is unfair to demand tourists to become either socially or environmentally accountable, because they buy expensive holiday packages, which already include the compensation for the problems they can pose.
In conclusion, even though some businessmen believe that local government should exempt tourists from any responsibilities, I think that officials should encourage them to become courteous to communities and environment for the above mentioned reasons.
- Today, majority of children are raised by their grandparents. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family? 11
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- Nowadays people have adopted an unhealthy lifestyle Why do think this is How could this problem be solved 20
- Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment, but population and education as well.What problems will your country face in the next ten years?How can these problems be overcome? 84
- The international community should do more to tackle the threat of global warming To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom local communities will become lower. However, some businessmen argue that tou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0421686747 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67422967576 2.80592935109 131% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575301204819 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0781076833 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236412584305 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808567165583 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599070506152 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158142163477 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132297969422 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.