In the future, robots will do more and more jobs instead of humans. Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?
Nowadays, the industry is becoming more modern with automation. With this development, there is an on-coming issue that humans will replace by automatic machines in the workplace in the coming days. While this argument has several demerits, I believe that its merits are far greater.
There are downsides to introducing robots in industries. First and foremost, many skilled professionals may get layoffs from the employer. That explains people with several years of experience may lose their employment, and they will struggle for suitable positions. Moreover, people, who work frequently, will live a sedentary life. For example, some jobs require supervising and physical effort. If employers reduce this work effort by adding robots, individuals would perform less activity and eventually, this will lead to more health problems like obesity. However, there would still be chances of people working conveniently.
Even though the world becomes more advance with automatic robots, the scope of many skilled employees will be significant. This is because the robots will require programming, timely maintenance, and surveillance. As robotic systems break down, either they will need replacement or repair, but that can only be possible with human involvement. In addition, these hardware and software issues can be complex, which will be difficult for robots to solve. During that time, thus, the workplace will need humans to resolve key problems.
In conclusion, although there would be many cons, such as fear of losing jobs, and health concerns, I believe that upcoming opportunities and a more evolving world will be beneficial for humans with automation robots. So, it is better that people always look at positive perspectives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-18 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | shahsajjad | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | vinitpate2001@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | marosa | 67 | view |
| 2017-02-02 | khi.iu.meo | 74 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 84
- You share a parking area with several neighbours and have recently started having problems Write a letter to be copied to all neighbours that share the parking area In that letter explaining the problems suggesting ways to help the situation proposing a p 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 67
- Last week you were on a flight to London Unfortunately when you got off the plane you left a bag there You did not remember about the bag until you got to your hotel Write a letter to the airline In your letter explain what has happened describe the bag a 87
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, the industry is becoming more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 358, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this hardware' or 'these hardwares'?
Suggestion: this hardware; these hardwares
...le with human involvement. In addition, these hardware and software issues can be complex, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5468164794 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81963525481 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644194756554 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0224029887 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1176470588 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228920982086 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693490105818 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506557653826 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14401553508 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284402746467 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.