Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do yo u agree with this statement?

Nowadays, government is taking initiatives to develop arts and culture in the society; however some thinks that rather this money should be used in improving public services. I agree that both the fields are important in developing a better place for the society to live in.

Public services are building blocks of any nation. Spending on services like hospitals, roads and public toiletries provides a sustainable infrastructure to live in. For example, in India, government has launched many reforms to build new roads to connect remote villages with urban life. This in turn helped farmers in villages to look out for more business avenues.

Moreover, these services are necessity for smooth functioning of the society. To exemplify this, access to better government-provided hospitals help individuals to maintain their health, in turn it increases life expectancy of the nation as a whole.
Despite of the above fact, allotment of a financial budget to promote arts and theatre in equally necessary. Supporting and promoting entertainment industry helps us to connect and know more about our culture and history. For instance, the yearly Ram Leela show performed by artisans in India provides us knowledge about our cultural background and its significance. Furthermore, arts, theatre and entertainment are regarded as recreational activities, which mean they help an individual to overcome the boredom of his mundane life.

In conclusion, investing and developing in art and culture society is as important as investing in public services. Both of these go hand in hand for nurturing citizens of any country.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43083003953 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05212569562 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616600790514 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3754393872 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166875707774 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530902249523 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512622426729 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093788698381 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451996288189 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.