The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
In the present age, the question of whether governments' investment in arts is necessary or not, has sparkled many debates. Some people assert that it is completely a waste of money and time. Nevertheless, personally speaking, I am in favor of the latter view, which believes the investment in arts is a must.
Convincing arguments can be made that arts act as a predominant role in human society, and have a noble status in human civilization. First and foremost, arts are not only about beauty and aesthetic value, but also represent a crucial way of people to explore the realistic world, reflect on the ultimate issues, such as the meaning of living and the value of human civilization, etc. It lends a helping hand for the confused and hopeless people who urge to find ways to realize their dreams. Moreover, our contemporary society can never abandon arts, and that's because it is ubiquitous. For instance, the production and operation of short videos, the most fashionable and commercially valuable mode of transmission nowadays, can not be separated from the addition of arts. People love high quality videos which are a blend of marvelous music and tremendous pictures.
The direct association between economy and arts is also easy to tell. To start with, the annual output of the entertainment industry reaches billions of yuan in China. In addition, auction of valuable work of art has been one of the most significant means for wealthy people to manage their finances.
To conclude, art plays a crucial role in human society and can create great economic value. So investment in arts is indispensable for governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 56 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 84
- my interpretation of civilization
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In the present age, the question of whether governments investment in arts is neces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'finding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: finding
...e confused and hopeless people who urge to find ways to realize their dreams. Moreover,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ary society can never abandon arts, and thats because it is ubiquitous. For instance,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, in addition, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0442804428 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88653829371 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0624341934 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131627212474 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478356862194 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495984225181 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940539761588 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665048867056 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.