The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
With the development of the economy, the government has gradually shifted its goal from ensuring people's material life to improving people's spiritual life. People's material life has been satisfied, so their spiritual life. People's material life has been satisfied, so their spiritual life needs to be guaranteed even more. Therefore, art, music and drama have become people's spiritual food. The government is also starting to invest in this area. Personally, I don't agree that the government should continue to dedicate money to public services. I think we need to invest reasonable money in the art field.
The art, music, and drama of a country represent its unique culture and style, as well as the integrity and soul of a nation. That is to say, we can see the culture of a country from the development of its art field. For example, our movie "War Wolf2" has strongly enhanced the patriotic consciousness of the people. When Wu Jing held the national flag high, our inner pride and love for our motherland immediately arose. This is the power of art, not only for entertainment, but also for the promotion and development of national culture. If we do not invest in the art field and only blindly develop people's livelihood, then our country's culture will lag behind.
The development of art is also conducive to the enrichment of the people's spiritual life. In other words, art is an indispensable part of our society, which can help people entertain themselves and improve themselves. For example, after watching the movie "Shawshank's Redemption", we learned a new philosophy of life and understood the significance of freedom for people. After listening to a song, we can not only relax ourselves, but also make ourselves more energetic.
To sum up, although I believe that the government needs to allocate most of its money to social emergencies, I also believe that we cannot ignore art, music and drama, which also require funding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 56 | view |
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 78
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 80
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should the government give more financial support to local film industries 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...g to invest in this area. Personally, I dont agree that the government should contin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i think, as well as, in other words, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9403257691 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50773993808 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9874806764 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6111111111 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167098072538 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066239592842 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757944185265 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986007789086 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597966553925 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...g to invest in this area. Personally, I dont agree that the government should contin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i think, as well as, in other words, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9403257691 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50773993808 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9874806764 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6111111111 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167098072538 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066239592842 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757944185265 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986007789086 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597966553925 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.