The government should allocate more funding to teaching science rather than other subjects for a country to develop and progress
To what extend do you agree?
Allocation of proper funding is vital among different subjects, so that knowledge of that domain is imparted to the pupils. A segment of society asserts that state should provide more sources to provide the knowledge of the science, in comparison to other subjects, as this to lead to further development of the nation. However, I do not agree with notion and have dissenting opinion that equal funding is required for all the subjects.
Considering the views of the people who feel that imparting knowledge of science is more essential. Undoubtedly, teaching science will help to develop the interest of the students in the field. Further, more scientific innovation and advancement will take place, which will help the country in the growth. However, merely knowledge of science will not going help, all the subject go hand in hand for progress. In other words, if only few will have knowledge of economic, IT and Business, than all the scientists can never lead to nation's progress. This world needs equal number of economist, business person, scientists and many more for balanced and stable growth.
Scientific research and equipment requires funding, but subject like History and Arts which are losing the interest of the children requires authoritie's attention, otherwise they will completely disappear in the near future. For example, India is the country of art and given many great artist to the world in the field of music, dance and singing. In the recent year, in proper equipment or place is available to practice this kind of Arts. If this will continue, our coming generation will not be able to carry the talent. Apart from this, knowledge of History is also diminishing, which is the root of any country and important to keep.
In conclusion, investment in science is required, but other subjects are also equally important. No country of this world can thrive, merely with scientific developments. Growth in different fields, will develop the base strong. Thus, providing more funds in teaching science is not at all making any sense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-09 | maninder.vadhrah1988@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhereTo what extend do you agree with this view? 61
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement?? 56
- In countries where there is high unemployment education should only be obligatory upto primary school and not secondary school To what extend do you agree 89
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere 89
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both sides and express your opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...r, merely knowledge of science will not going help, all the subject go hand in hand f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ientific research and equipment requires funding, but subject like History and Ar...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...science is not at all making any sense.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15727002967 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66224534929 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528189910979 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7366329726 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230564891692 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711873554337 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450986902615 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146877568076 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577256412319 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.