Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere
To what extend do you agree with this view?
Effective utilization of government funds is essential for the growth of the nation. Few people assert that state should not waste the funds on the arts, and this funds must be utilized in other sectors, which are more important for the growth of the nation. I do not agree with notion and strongly believe that expenditure on arts is pivotal, which has numerous benefits and must not be ignored.
To begin with, Government budget is planned by the committee and it is properly allocated to different segments. Sectors like health, education and economy are given more importance and proper money is allocated to this segments. Funding for the Arts of the country is not that high and mostly whatever expenditure is done is extremely essential. If heavy amount is spend on Arts and others major sectors are ignored, than it requires some alteration, but this is not the case in most countries. For example, in India not more than 5 percentage is allotted to the development of the art in the country. Therefore, spending on Arts is not that high and it will not deprive growth of other segments.
Moreover, spending on arts has various advantages, and it will help in the nation's development. The predominate reason is preservation of ancient culture and tradition of the nations. Ancient artifacts requires proper preservation, which is not possible without funds. If proper funds are not provided to the arts, our coming generation will completely loss its culture, whereas primitive things holds special value and it help's the nation to have distinct identity in the world. Furthermore, it is helpful in boosting the tourism in the country. People often travel different places to explore something unique and new around the world. Additionally, it will increase the employment opportunities for the youth, which is unequivocally important for economical growth. Hence, this spending on arts is not at all waste, whereas useful for nation's growth.
In conclusion, in my opinion development of art is the area which requires governments attention and proper funding, because of merits like development of tourism and employment generation.
- Human activity has had negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both the views and give your opinion? 73
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhereTo what extend do you agree with this view? 61
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both sides and express your opinion 87
- Some people fail in school, but end up being successful in life. Why do you think that is the case? What is most important thing to succeed in life? 61
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed. What are the reasons for doing this?Is this a positive or negative development. 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rtance and proper money is allocated to this segments. Funding for the Arts of the c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...s and others major sectors are ignored, than it requires some alteration, but this i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ous advantages, and it will help in the nations development. The predominate reason is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t will help in the nations development. The predominate reason is preservation of ancient cultu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 751, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...h, which is unequivocally important for economical growth. Hence, this spending on arts is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18103448276 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84540659381 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8333333333 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.166666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168335068995 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05030757976 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469030376078 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101039701099 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552448693067 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.