In bygone days, there were no enough funds accounted for education. However, now people live in the modern era, where many changes have taken place. Nowadays, education is an essential thing for everyone. It is a general belief that government should provide tuition fee who wants study. It has both benefits and adverse too. I firmly agree with the statement that, the government should help those who need help in education.
To commence with, there are certain reasons to support my view. Firstly, education is base on advancement and technology. There are lots of people who are in-country, who want to study their tertiary education but their guardian cannot afford university’s fees. As a result, people leave their education after 12th grade. Moreover, now government provide lots fund inform of scholarship to student. People who get good marks in 12th get price money from the government. Besides this, pupils, who are disabled and want to learn then they will get help from NGOs. For example, in Gujarat states there are more than 150 NGOs are working for needy people to help by paying fees for students who want peruse their tertiary education.
In addition to this, it is evident that people from poor backgrounds are very erudite. Also, they have good problem-solving skills compared to the reach people. Furthermore, these people are working hard to fulfill their dream and at the end they get appropriate results for the same. A good illustration of this is, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, who came from a poor family but they have an eagerness to learn something and they got proper guidance and support from the community and in the end, they became president of our country.
To recapitulate, although this trend has disadvantages, advantages are far more. I strongly agree that government should help those who want to complete their university education. It is suggested that first of all government should check student’s previous result if they got good marks then it would be worthy to pay his fees.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
- the pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate 84
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 73
- an increasing number of people are now using a dating website to meet their second halves Do you think these tendency help people or does harm than good 73
- The pie charts below shows units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nd technology. There are lots of people who are in-country, who want to study their ter...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02380952381 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63221796753 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568452380952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.8898936543 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238892531337 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672608664043 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799369733042 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156475468658 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720678778644 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.